Energy Efficient Lighting Upgrades for City Buildings

The City has taken another exciting step toward reducing energy use by performing lighting upgrades at the Coffon Building, Engine 8 (Taylor Square), Fire Headquarters and three buildings at the Cambridge Cemetery. Existing lights within these facilities have been replaced with high-efficiency lamps and fixtures, and occupancy sensors have been installed in many locations throughout the buildings in order to reduce energy use and costs even further. Projected energy savings from these lighting efficiency upgrades is an estimated 130,000 kilowatt hours/year, resulting in avoided costs of approximately $18,000/year for the City. These energy savings represent averting close to 200,000 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere annually, the equivalent of removing 18 cars from the road!

The electric use of these buildings will continue to be monitored as part of the City’s Green Community commitment to reduce energy use by 20% from its FY08 baseline. Energy efficient lighting technologies have been installed in 22 municipal buildings over the past two years with a projected total savings of 1.3 megawatt hours/year.

Stay tuned for future energy efficiency upgrades!

Green Mobility in Freiburg

The Altstadt

Cars are prominent in Freiburg, but there is a different relationship between people, bicycles, transit and cars compared to home.  Cars defer to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit as they negotiate the city streets.  Bicyclists and pedestrians move around each other fluidly.  There is also a higher level of convenience in using non-automobile travel modes.

Freiburg has made the Altstadt – the old core of the city – a car-free zone.  Only residents who live within the zone and service vehicles can drive in.  Pedestrians, cyclists, and the tram are freer to move.   Fraziska Breyer of the City government told us that when the car-free zone was proposed, businesses were very concerned that shoppers would shun the center.  But the decision has instead made the old city a more attractive area for shoppers and visitors.  The streets are bustling with people and cyclists are everywhere.   To some degree there are too many cyclists in the old city.  On the main street of Kaiser Joseph Strasse, the city had to prohibit bicycle parking near the area where the tram lines intersect because they were blocking walkers.

The tram (street car) system is excellent   The trams do not for the most part run on separate rights-of-way.  They run on rails in the street along with the cars and cyclists.  Throughout the city, trams have traffic signal priority; the lights change as the trams approach to allow the tram to move through intersections.  And the system makes it very easy to use the tram.  Tickets can be bought at electronic vending machines and there are multiple choices – single rides, all day passes, group passes, etc.  When you board the tram, there are no conductors or turnstiles to go through.  Riders are expected to punch the tickets themselves to mark the time their use started.  Conductors do spot checks and scofflaws can be fined.  When waiting for the tram, there are electronic information boards that give riders real time information on when the next tram will arrive.  There is also an extensive bus system, although I didn’t have the opportunity to ride a bus.  To top it all off, the public transportation system is 100% powered by renewable energy – 80% hydro and 20% solar, wind, and other renewables.

There is an extensive network of bicycle lanes, paths, and roads.  We were told there are 410 kilometers of these facilities.  In some areas whole street segments are marked to give bicycles priorities.  Cars can be on these bicycle roads, but they have to drive at similar speeds to cyclists and defer to them.

Traffic rules are enforced on cars and cyclists.  A 30 kilometer per hour speed limit applies in the city center.  It’s enforced by radar and photo.  Cyclists are expected to follow traffic rules too.  Frau Breyer said she once turned right at an intersection without stopping at a sign and was caught by the police.  She received a ticket.

Freiburg has a non-profit car sharing association.  It sounded like it has had a similar effect to Zipcar in Cambridge, providing an alternative for people who don’t want to own a car and eliminating the need for owning a second car.

Bike parking at the train station

Freiburg seems to take all modes of transit and weave them into a seamless system.  Our study group took a bicycle tour of the city’s sustainability highlights.  We rented bicycles at a shop housed in a building that also provided bicycle parking for a fee on two levels and car sharing below.  The building was located at the main train station, which was intersected by the tram system.  Buses and taxi stations were also located there.  The whole system was reliable, flexible, safe, and enjoyable.

The transportation mode shares reported by the city in 1999 – the City said the data is being updated – is 23% pedestrian, 27% bicycles, 18% transit, 6% ride sharing, and 26% single occupancy driving.  I’m not sure if that is all trips (I think that is so) or just commuting.

I wasn’t able to learn all the factors that enable Freiburg to have such a wonderful transportation system.  I’m sure there are reasons why it is easier to have such a great system in Freiburg, but it makes you want to replicate it at home.

Next:  Freiburg’s eco-villages – Reiselfeld and Vauban.

Freiburg – Greenest City in Europe?

Kaiser Joseph Strasse, in Freiburg Center

I’m on a personal study tour of Germany and Holland to see what German and Dutch cities are doing about reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to climate change.  The tour is organized by ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, an organization that the City of Cambridge has been a member of since 1999.  Our tour leader, Jade Jackson, is leading our group of 4 Canadians and 2 Americans through Freiburg and Dresden Germany, and then on to Bonn to attend the ICLEI Climate Resilient Communities conference.  We will end up in Rotterdam in The Netherlands.  I thought I would try to share what I see and learn along the way.  I hope you find it useful and interesting.

In Cambridge, we often look to Europe for examples of how to make the city more sustainable given that we are a dense urban community that in many ways is more similar to European cities than American.  On this tour, I’m looking to see how the cities here have implemented actions that we have thought about, and actions that we have not even considered yet, particularly in regard to adaptation.

Freiburg, of the Black Forest, is our first stop.  It might be the greenest city in Europe [or the world?].  Renewable energy is a big focus here.  But they also have a very admirable sustainable transportation system, waste management, and land use.

Freiburg’s old city center was largely destroyed in World War II.  About 80% of the city center was bombed toward the end of the war.  After the war, the city decided to keep the historic street pattern and re-build on the foundations of the destroyed buildings, reconstructing in the historic style.  Much larger new development surrounds the old city, but within the city boundaries there are large areas devoted to farms, vineyards, and protected forests; about half of the city is open space.  Today, Freiburg is a growing city of about 220,000 people with a major university and service base.

"Nuclear power, no thank you."

We met with Franziska Breyer, of the City’s environment agency, who presented the history and overview of the city’s sustainability efforts.  Freiburg’s green movement began with anti-nuclear protests in 1973, when new nuclear plants were proposed just across the border in France and nuclear waste storage was proposed nearby in Germany.  Those protests led to people thinking that they could not just be against nuclear power, but need to be for something.    I visited Freiburg 30 years ago as I was involved myself during college in anti-nuclear protest at home and wanted to see what the fuss was about here.  Ironically, as we arrived in Freiburg last weekend, there were again anti-nuclear protests taking place as the Conservative government reconsidered its nuclear policy in the wake of Fukushima and reversed course, deciding to plan to phase out nuclear energy by 2022.  So I imagine the protests were part celebratory.

The alternatives Freiburg has come up with encompass energy efficient construction, solar energy, district energy, wind energy, biomass, a well-integrated, multi-modal transportation system, and waste reduction practices.  I’m sure we didn’t hear about everything.

Freiburg has set a goal in 2007 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% below 1992 levels by 2030.  As of 2009, the city has achieved an 18.6% reduction.  The municipal government has a climate protection budget of 1.2 million Euros, which is largely funded by annual payments from utilities for use of public space for infrastructure. The budget does not include additional funds set aside for energy efficiency subsidies provided to residents (21 million Euros since 2003), investment in public facilities and infrastructure, transportation, and other services.

Frau Breyer talked about the sustainability concept that the city’s efforts are based on.  While it is common to think of sustainability in terms of balancing the 3 “E’s” – ecology, economy, and equity, she said in Freiburg they see sustainability as fundamentally based on ecology and that this is not negotiable.   Without a sound ecology, there cannot be a viable economy and equitable society.  The economy and social welfare flow from this sound ecological base.

The city is working to grow its green economy.  The green city initiatives are seen as a factor in attracting green businesses to locate in Freiburg.  There are about 1,500 green businesses employing about 10,000 people.  Of those ten thousand, about 1,500 people are employed in the solar energy sector.

The energy strategy is based on energy saving, efficient generation, and renewable energy.  About 10% of the electricity is supplied by nuclear in Freiburg.  About half is produced by co-generation units that also provide heat through district heating systems.  In addition to larger co-gen units, there are about 90 small CHP units around the city.

Badenova Sports Stadium roofs covered with Solar PV

Solar energy is very visible around Freiburg.  Currently 12.3 MW of solar capacity is in place, producing over 10 million kilowatt-hours annually.  For context, the City of Cambridge consumes about 40 million kwh of total electricity annually,which is a small percentage of total use in Cambridge.  Cambridge has close to 1 MW of solar PV in place.  In Freiburg, solar thermal panels cover about 15,000 square meters.  Solar PV has been ramped up by very generous feed-in tariffs created by the federal government, which pays owners for the electricity production.  The federal government is now moving to phase out the feed-in tariffs as they believe they have served their function of creating a solar industry.  We were told that while the feed-in tariffs have been successful in expanding the use of solar PV, the price of solar PV has not really decreased, which was one of the goals of the policy.  And while solar panels are a common sight in Freiburg, they are installed on a minority of buildings.

There are 5 medium sized wind turbines installed on the hills around the city.  They produce 14 million kwh every year, more than produced by all the solar PV panels.

Bugginger StrasseHi-Rise, first to meet Passivhaus energy standards

We were told that increasing efficiency in existing buildings remains a challenge.   The City has invested 21 million Euros since 2003, which has leveraged an additional 23 million Euros.  Generally the funds have been used toward efficiency improvements when buildings are undergoing major renovations.  This investment has reached about 3 to 4% of the building stock.

The Vice Mayor said they see the future trend being toward more short-distance district heating, noting the high cost of installing infrastructure, and more micro-CHP.

There is more to admire in Freiburg’s energy practices, including their eco-villages with buildings meeting Passivhaus standards and Plus Energy houses.

Upcoming: Sustainable Transportation and Freiburg’s eco-villages – Vauban and Rieselfeld.

Energy Star Rating Standards to Tighten

Energy Star Logo

The Environmental Protection Agency recently announced updates to its Energy Star Rating requirements on televisions and cable boxes. The revisions are the first in a list of about 20 products that will receive updates to their Energy Star Rating requirements this year.

Currently, Energy Star rated televisions hold at least 70% of the Market Share. The stricter standards mean, according to the EPA, “substantial overall energy bill reduction, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions.”

The new standards are requiring a 40% reduction in watt usage. For example, a 60 inch television currently averages about 282 watts, but the come September the same 60 inch TV will be required to use less than 108 watts to receive an Energy Star Rating. Talk about saving a watt!

In its announcement, the EPA states that if all U.S. homes had Energy Star rated TVs and cable boxes under these new requirements, savings would reach $5 billion a year and reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions equal to that of taking over 700 million cars off the road.

Federal Efforts for Energy Efficiency

President Barack Obama

President Barack Obama

In the 2011 State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama highlighted many goals as part of the administration’s “winning the future” campaign. Energy efficiency was one such goal, and last Thursday the President, speaking at Penn State, unveiled the Better Buildings Initiative, a plan for a 20% improvement in energy efficiency in commercial buildings by 2020. It’s no coincidence the plan was reveled at Penn State, a school with more than 500 researchers working on energy and environmental studies. The President touted Penn State as a leader in the research towards a clean energy future.

The initiative also strives to reduce companies’ energy bills by $40 billion per year. The plan aims to achieve these goals through a number of different approaches, including tax incentives, loans, and challenges to turn the private sector towards the mind set that clean energy is a worthwhile investment.

In the plan, five main points are presented to achieve these goals.

  • Tax incentives – A call to redesign tax code, this would create more incentives through tax breaks and credits for businesses to make energy efficiency improvements to their properties.
  • More financing opportunities – Through a recent increase in loan size limits, the Small Business Administration is encouraging current lenders to promote loans made specifically for small businesses to improve the efficiency of their buildings. Also, a new pilot program is proposed in the President’s budget that will guarantee loans for improvements on hospitals, schools, and other commercial buildings.
  • Promote state and local governments to encourage energy efficiency in the private sector – The President’s proposed budgets will include new competitive grants for state and municipal governments to encourage the private sector to invest in energy efficiency upgrades to commercial buildings. This is important because many codes, regulations, and standards on commercial energy efficiency are set and controlled by state and local governments.
  • The Better Buildings Challenge – The President will challenge CEOs and University Presidents to become leaders in the movement of commercial building energy efficiency by making those leading the way eligible for benefits that include public recognition, technical assistance, and access to “best-practices sharing” within a network of like minded peers.
  • Training the next generation of commercial building technology workers – The plan looks to provide more transparency around energy efficiency performance, and provide better training in energy auditing and building operations.

To show the government is truly behind its aspirations for energy efficiency, President Obama issued an executive order to federal agencies, directing them to achieve zero net energy by 2030. Among the requirements, all new constructions and alterations must employ high performance and sustainable design principles. As a mark of progress of this Executive Order, at least 15% of existing federal buildings must meet these principles by 2015.

As for the energy efficiency in the homes of American families, this particular plan does not touch on the subject, but it builds off of the proposed “HOMESTAR” legislation, which encouraged Americans to make energy saving upgrades to their homes. While the house passed the Home Star Energy Retrofit Act of 2010, it never came to vote in the Senate. The President says his remains committed to passing this legislation.

As 2012 approaches, President Barack Obama will be starting to campaign for reelection in the coming months. Look for energy efficiency policy to be a big part of his “winning the future” campaign unveiled during the State of the Union Address last month.

350.org Solar Road Trip to White House

Beginning September 7th, Bill McKibben and students from Unity College in Maine are on a road trip to Washington D.C., with a specific goal in mind. This 350.org-affiliated group plans to approach the White House to urge President Obama to install solar panels on his roof in order to finally make a stand on energy issues, set an example for citizens, and to participate in 350.org’s “Global Work Party” on October 10th (10-10-10).

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the White House. In 1986, President Reagan removed them and they were never replaced. Years later, Unity College in Maine adopted the panels where they have lived ever since. Until now.

Unity College has removed one panel from their cafeteria roof and donated it to 350.org’s campaign to convince President Obama to put solar back on the White House roof.

The road tripping group is carrying with them the one historical solar panel, a public message, and a promise from a company who will donate a slew of new panels to populate the rest of the roof with as long as the President agrees to take the challenge.

As a way of bringing awareness to the mission and garnering support with which to face the White House, the bio-diesel-powered caravan has made stops along the way in Boston and New York City. At each stop, discussions were had and signatures were gathered in a petition of a unique form: on the glass front of the panel!

With the recent failure of any action toward comprehensive clean energy/climate action legislation in the Senate, many feel that it is an imperative time for the President to take a stand on energy issues. This is one way for him to do just that without the rest of the Government interceding; as Mr. McKibben stated, “they can’t filibuster his roof.”

Not only will this be a great first act on the issue of energy, but if the White House takes leadership here, it might jump-start the rest of the country to move in this direction (the 350.org web site details the significant spike in seed sales shortly after Michelle Obama planted the White House garden).

Thus far, somewhere throughout the stops that were made in Boston and NYC, Bill McKibben has spoken with the White House via telephone and heard that they are “interested” but that “it’s complicated.” Plans for further discussion have been scheduled.

Updates on the progress of the road trip are available via email sign-up, or by visiting the website. Less formal updates are available via Twitter, by following @Panel350.

Stay tuned!

You may view a trailer for the documentary surrounding the Presidential solar panels here.

Gubernatorial Forum- Energy & Environment

On June 29th, a two-hour gubernatorial forum was held in downtown Boston’s historic Old South Meeting House.

All candidates for Governor were welcomed to make a statement, followed by a short Q&A by the audience and two panelists.

The first candidate to speak, Governor Deval Patrick, spoke about Cape Wind, and addressed a question about the alternative of purchasing clean energy from other places, if it were cheaper than producing our own. In response to this, he unwittingly quoted Chairman Mao, “I don’t know who said it, but, we’re going to have to let a thousand flowers bloom,” and concluded that we’ve still got a long way to go, and no avenue should be left unexplored. Other topics he discussed were the state of parks after cut funding, the Evergreen Solar project and Chapter 40B. The overall theme for the Governor’s discussion was that “we have got a long way to go,” but the place Massachusetts is in now shows important progress.

The first new candidate to speak, Dr. Jill Stein of the Rainbow Green party, discussed passionately–

  • The need for transparency in government
  • The significance of Environmental Health factors as relate to human health and health costs
  • What she would like to change about taxes: She’d like to increase income taxes & reduce sales tax with goal of benefiting the lower & middle income folks who spend a higher percentage of their income on consumption. -But ultimately she would like to move towards a carbon tax.
  • Environmental Health issues – open communication of risks including a personal battle- mercury in fish

After Dr. Stein’s enthused and in depth discussion of environmental health and taxes, State Treasurer Tim Cahill took the podium. Mr. Treasurer announced right off the bat his less-detailed knowledge of environmental sciences, and the fact that his main goal was “jobs” and that it would inevitably mean clashing with environmentalists at times. He attempted to stress that he listens to all opinions before making decisions, but if it were environment versus development, he would unquestionably favor development.

Republican candidate Charles Baker had a previous speaking engagement, but he was represented at the event by Senate minority leader Bradley Jones. Mr. Jones was able to clarify that though Mr. Baker may not see that global warming is being caused by anthropogenic activities, he was able to see practicality, economical, and health-related reasons for fighting for cleaner practices.

State primaries will be held September 14, 2010, followed by elections for Governor on November 9, 2010.

Go Green Awards Nominations Deadline: April 5th

It is time again for the city of Cambridge’s Go Green Awards, which recognizes businesses and organizations that take exceptional environmental actions in at least one of five areas—energy use, transportation, waste reduction, stormwater, and climate protection. Self nominations are accepted.

Last year’s 2009 award recipient’s included:

Transportation: The Charles Hotel and Irving House

Waste Reduction: Grendel’s Den and Volpe Center

Climate Protection: Genzyme and Citigate Cunningham

Energy: HRI and Cambridge Health Alliance

Stormwater Management: Forest City and Old Cambridge Baptist Church

Community Organization: HEET

The deadline for the 2010 GoGreen Awards nominations is April 5. Use the GoGreen nomination form and submit to: John Bolduc, jbolduc@cambridgema.gov, fax 617-349-4633. The nomination form can be found at: http://www.cambridgema.gov/gogreen.   If you have any questions, contact John Bolduc, jbolduc@cambridgema.gov or 617-349-4628.

Save the date:  The 2010 GoGreen Awards ceremony will be held Tuesday, May 25 at 5:30 pm at the City Hall Annex, 344 Broadway.

Cambridge to host 3rd Climate Congress

EarthA third Climate Congress will be held on Saturday, March 6, 2010, from 9am to noon, in City Hall. The Climate Congress is open to the public. The main aim will be for delegates to unite on specific recommendations for City action. The Congress will use the opportunity to decide on whether to accept a final report on proposals and to bring the new citizen action teams together.

During the second Climate Congress, 75 delegates convened to develop recommendations to the city for addressing climate change, but also organize and develop citizen generated solutions.  Highlights from the second congress include:

  • The Congress discussed priorities among the proposals in the Draft Report. Several common themes emerged and these will be documented in the final report of the Congress.
  • Delegates formed action teams to work in specific areas: outreach, resilience, solar and other renewables, process for future climate emergency response (drafting), protection of trees and natural resources, building efficiency, and measurement . Several of these groups have already agreed to meet again. (If you are interested in participating in any of these groups contact Joanna Herlihy <joanna_herlihy@yahoo.com>)
  • Recommendations for climate emergency response by the City were considered and received broad support. However, there were questions about the specifics and report structure, that required more time to consider. Those present unanimously agreed to meet again for a third session to address those questions.

For more information about the climate emergency and the Climate Congress visit: http://www.cambridgema.gov/deptann.cfm?story_id=2457&pv=Yes

See also previous coverage I & II.

Stretch Code Passes in Cambridge

Green building by Max Ross After a series of public hearings, the Cambridge City Council adopted the stretch energy code on December 21st.  The stretch code is about 30% more efficient than the baseline building code and has different requirements for both the residential and commercial sectors.  Visit the city’s website to learn more about the stretch code, which includes a summary table that outlines the new requirements.

By passing the stretch energy code, the city of Cambridge demonstrates its continued commitment to reduce its carbon footprint, by requiring higher efficiency standards for buildings, which produce 80% of all carbon emissions in the city.  In addition, the city of Cambridge has now met one of the requirements of the Green Communities Act, that may provide grant funding for  efficiency and renewable energy initiatives.

The stretch code is not without controversy, as expressed in the E2.0 July blog post.  The city council weighed in feedback from the community and received recommendations for the code’s adoption from the Climate Protection Action Committee and the city’s Green Building Task Force.  The new building code will go into effect on July 1, 2010.