Are Smart Meters a Smart Idea?

410px-intelligenter_zaehler-_smart_meterThe debate on the value (and costs) of wide spread deployment and installation of ‘Smart Meters‘ for monitoring energy usage rages on-most notably in the pages of the Wall Street Journal.

A succession of articles and editorials has been published recently, with each author taking a particular side of the argument. As is the case with many issues batted about by the press these days, the reader is left none the wiser.

There are obviously large capital costs involved in both preparing each property for energy use metering and providing a display device for each customer to examine their energy costs–then make intelligent decisions about saving energy and reducing the costs of powering their house.

After seeing how this debate is starting to be defined in the public arena, Warm Home Cool Planet would like to share a couple of observations:

Given the fact most houses have internet access, there should be some cost savings in allowing customers to use their current computers or mobile devices to view real-time energy use information through a web browser. All you need is a simple web connection for each energy device that reports through a customer’s current web connection to a central database. This would also allow the utility to see energy consumption patterns in real-time, including the ability to respond to service outages before the customer even notices.

Secondly, the ‘unique’ editorial policies of papers owned by Rupert Murdoch allow editors to add their own opinions to articles which are meant to serve as informational tools for readers to make their own decisions. For instance, last week’s article was titled “Smart Meter. Dumb Idea?“. What would the casual reader make of this?

Editorials published in response “Smart Meters are, well, Smart” are revealed to be written by leaders of trade associations who are hardly neutral observers on this subject. In the end, WSJ readers are likely to walk away with a sense of confused paralysis on the whole issue.

No matter which side of this argument you’re on, that is not the outcome we need.

Cambridge Forum in Harvard Square

Cambridge Forum is one of public radio’s longest running public affairs programs. The program is recorded live every week in Harvard Square, before being broadcast on WGBH.

Next week, noted futurists Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus from the Breakthrough Institute will be speaking on the topic “Beyond the Pollution Paradigm: Why We Can’t Leave Saving the Planet to Environmentalists” 

As you can probably tell from the forum topic, these guys don’t follow anyone’s lead–or pull any punches–in suggesting how we can fix our environment and secure our energy future. They have been labeled as infidels and pariahs by everyone from the Sierra Club to Al Gore for their pro-growth, pro-technology environmental ideas. 

Warm Home Cool Planet will be there. What about you?

Time & Date: 7:30pm – May 6, 2009
Location: First Parish: 3 Church St., Cambridge, MA

New York Sized Ice Shelf Collapse

iceberg

Yesterday another Global Warming news story made the headlines about a New York-sized ice shelf collapsing off Antarctica— a grave reminder of the growing impacts of climate change.  The Wilkins Ice shelf in Antarctica is destabilizing and this month’s ice loss is the latest of 10 shelves on the antarctic peninsula to retreat with more melting expected.   On a positive note, the US is finally moving forward on Climate policy with the Environmental Protection Agency recent finding that greenhouse gases contribute to air pollution that may endanger public health or welfare, which now moves to a public comment period.

In addition, Congressman Henry A. Waxman and Congressman Edward J. Markey released the American Clean Energy and Security Act that requires  emissions to  be reduced 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, while Mr. Obama’s plancalls for a 14 percent reduction by 2020. Both would reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases by 80 percent by 2050.  The bill would also require every region of the country to produce a quarter of its electricity from renewable sources like wind, solar and geothermal by 2025.

The American Clean Energy and Security Act currently lacks sufficienct votes for passage, but with the global warming crisis intensifying and the time horizon for effective action closing, it is imperative that we take local actions to reduce our carbon emissions and also support renewable energy projects in our own communities.

Cambridge’s Efficiency Goal Gap

Recently, we’ve begun some efforts to analyze and map energy use data in the City, and a volunteer created this compelling graph that roughly demonstrates how far Cambridge is from meeting its goal to reduce emissions to pre-1990 levels. Of course the graph actually plots electricity use, and not emissions but the two are well correlated, and we hope to have a more complete graph of emissions including natural gas in the future.

Cambridge Efficiency Goal

Cambridge's Efficiency Goal Gap

Note: Due to limitations in the available data, energy use for some apartments is included in “Commercial.”

If you’d like to learn more about improving energy use in your home or office and receive an audit visit the Cambridge Energy Alliance.

Report from the Summit

logo

Cambridge, MA-Friday, April 24: Over 300 people, including your faithful Warm Home Cool Planet correspondent, assembled in Walker Memorial Hall at MIT to hear from some of the major players and most provocative thinkers in the field of sustainability. Unlike the content you’ll find here, which stretches all the way from global energy policy to insulating your water pipes, the Sustainability @ MIT conference was exclusively focused on the big picture.

Continue reading

Smart Shopping 101

We all shop and live in a capitalistic society.  That being said, more so than ever consumers are given the option to buy “green”, but what does that really mean?  Cage free eggs do not necessarily mean chickens roam wild on hundreds of acres, but instead have an inch or so more room to move in their pen.   And “organic”?  How are we really sure what we buy is truly organic?  Is a USDA “organic” label enough?  For the conscientious consumer, all of these questions plague our minds but there is hope in the form of Good Guide: http://www.goodguide.com/.   This ever-updated database is a wealth of information for people looking to make the greenest bang for their buck.   The ratings are based on health, environmental and social performance http://www.goodguide.com/about/ratings.

Take a look for yourself today and begin to shop smarter and greener!

What? Greenhouse gasses, dangerous?

The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) has recently determined that greenhouse gasses(GHG) pose a danger to public health and welfare. This weeks announcement by the EPA enables the agency to put the Clean Air Act into action. The act defines the responsibility of the EPA as protecting and improving the nations air quality.  There is a 60 day public comment period which will be documented in the federal registrar.   Once the public comment period closes, the EPA will be required to take some sort of action.

In addition, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, is being reviewed in the house and hopefully will gain the traction needed to pass as the nation’s first commitment to reduce its GHG emissions.  The bill calls for reducing greenhouse gas emissions 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 42% by 2030, and 83% by 2050. If the EPA were to enact this legislation, it would most likely address emissions from automobiles, power plants, and major industrial sources.

factories

http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-17-epa-moves-toward-regulating/

This man needs your signature on Earth Day.

enviro-gore

Al Gore has aligned with Repower America to ask everyone throughout the US to send a message to their local congressman to support the  energy legislation currently before the House. The Repower folks have made it easy too. All you have to do is add your email address and zip code. They’ll make sure it gets to the right politician.

Happy Earth/Wind/Sun Day

Wind TurbineWind TurbinesIt’s Earth Day, 2009.  What have you done this year to lessen your carbon footprint, save energy, and shop responsibly?  I remain imperfect although I claim to be “green.”  I educate myself, take public transit to work, turn off lights, shop with reusable bags and keep the heat off as much as possible.  Still, is this enough?  I’ve decided it’s important to not get overwhelmed and instead do what you can using the “every vote counts” motto.

For example, a simple way to support renewable energy is a mere few clicks away.  Just recently I learned Boston-area residents have the option to support clean wind power under NSTAR Green. This program makes it easy for consumers to support wind energy by demanding their electricity be provided by wind, not coal.  You have the option of choosing between 50% and 100% wind power.  And no, it’s not that expensive.  So, on this Earth Day, do your part by checking out NSTAR Green and switching from coal-generated electricity to wind.