Cambridge Community Electricity Program to Fund Development of Local Solar Project, Provide Savings to Consumers

The City’s new contract with Direct Energy will increase local renewable energy production and provide lower electricity rates than Eversource Basic Service

CAMBRIDGE, MA — The Cambridge Community Electricity Program is launching a new model for using the City’s electricity aggregation to directly create more local renewable electricity. Effective January 15, 2019, the program will collect a small amount of money, $0.002/kWh, from all participants as part of their regular electricity bill, which will be used to fund a new local solar project. Once built, the solar project will provide green electricity to everyone enrolled in the Cambridge Community Electricity Program.
The new program model is made possible through a 24-month electricity supply contract with Direct Energy. This contract offers new program prices that are fixed from January 2019 through January 2021. Participants in the Standard Green option will receive greener electricity than available through Eversource Basic Service by supporting the new local solar project. The Standard Green price will change to 11.12 cents/kWh, which is lower than Eversource’s January 2019 through June 2019 residential price of 13.704 cents/kWh.
The previous 100% Green option is now the new and improved 100% Green Plus option, which current 100% Green participants will be automatically enrolled in. 100% Green Plus participants will continue to receive 100% renewable electricity through the purchase of renewable energy certificates (RECs) from existing renewable energy projects in New England and will receive additional solar electricity from the local solar project. The 100% Green Plus price will be 11.94 cents/kWh, also less than Eversource’s winter 2019 Basic Service price. Any Cambridge resident or business can opt into 100% Green Plus at any time.
“This innovative model for our Community Electricity Program supports Cambridge’s local economy and furthers our renewable energy goals without having a negative impact on personal finances,” said Cambridge City Manager Louis A. DePasquale. “We are proud to continue pioneering programs that lower the carbon footprint of our community in cost-effective ways.”

Beginning in February 2019, Direct Energy will replace Agera Energy as the supplier listed on Eversource electricity bills. Participants will continue to receive and pay one bill from Eversource, which will be responsible for delivering electricity to Cambridge and for addressing power outages. Those who are eligible for discounts from Eversource will continue to receive the same benefits. Those with solar panels on their property will continue to receive net metering credits, which will be calculated based on the Eversource Basic Service rate, not on the program rate.

Savings cannot be guaranteed for future Eversource rate periods because Eversource’s prices change every 6 months for residential and small business customers and every 3 months for large business customers. Program participation is not required; participants can opt out of the program at any time with no penalty or fee and return to Eversource Basic Service.

All active accounts will be automatically enrolled in the new contract with Direct Energy unless participants choose to opt out. New Eversource electricity accounts in Cambridge will also be automatically enrolled in the program.

To switch between Standard Green or 100% Green Plus enrollment options or to opt out of the program, call Direct Energy at 1-866-968-8065. Cambridge residents and businesses currently enrolled with the Cambridge Community Electricity Program do not need to take any action to continue their enrollment as part of this new program model.

Additional information is available on the program website at www.masspowerchoice.com/cambridge. Questions or comments can be directed to Cambridge Community Electricity program consultants at 1-844-379-9934 or cambridge@masspowerchoice.com

Launched in July 2017, the Cambridge Community Electricity Program is an electricity aggregation, which uses the bulk purchasing power of the entire community to negotiate a price and increase the amount of renewable energy in the City’s electricity supply. The City uses a competitive bidding process to choose an electricity supplier for residents and businesses and to secure the best price possible for the community while advancing the City’s sustainability goals.

Reminder: Light Bulb Swap on Saturday!

this-and-this

If you are a Cambridge resident, this is a reminder to come swap up to three of your incandescent or CFL light bulbs* for free LED replacements this Saturday, Dec. 10, at the Cambridge Winter Farmer’s Market at 5 Callender St, from 10am-2pm! We will also have a pop-up store with heavily discounted LEDs for all of your other lighting needs.

*The swap is limited to A19 and BR30 bulbs.

This event is part of the City’s 100% LED Campaign that encourages residents to change over their lighting to LEDs, which use six times less energy. Please note that the bulb swap is limited to Cambridge residents and while supplies last.

 

City Offers Limited-Time Incentives to Go 100% LED!

It’s about to get a whole lot easier to upgrade your lights and save money and energy! The City’s Cambridge Energy Alliance is partnering with Eversource to launch the “100% LED Cambridge” campaign, which offers limited-time specials on LED light bulbs for Cambridge residents. The campaign encourages residents to upgrade 100% of their home lighting to LEDs, which use six times less energy than older bulbs.

led

 

From now until November 26th, residents can go to https://www.techniart.us/Cambridge/ to get special pricing that is available to Cambridge residents only. Customers can also get discounted shipping while supplies last. Not sure what bulb to get? See our guide at CambridgeMA.gov/LED

 

 

The 100% LED campaign is one of the city’s initiatives to win the Georgetown University Energy Prize, a nationwide competition among cities to cut residential energy use through energy efficiency. Residents have until the end of December 2016 to help Cambridge win before the judging period is over. Find out more at www.CambridgeEnergyAlliance.org/WinIt!

Money Saving Light Bulbs

During the summer of 2014 several high school students interned at the Cambridge Energy Alliance helping with canvassing and outreach across Cambridge. The interns also wrote a few blogs on topics they were interested in related to energy efficiency and solar power. The following is one of their blogs.  

 

Today, unfortunately, money is on the minds of many people. This blog offers a simple and straightforward strategy to save money, and energy, by using different types of light bulbs. Currently in the US most people use incandescent light bulbs in their households. However, slowly the tide has turned to Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) bulbs, which offer greater service and economic satisfaction. But what is it that makes these light bulbs so different? Of course they all have differences in their structure, design and technology, but which one is the best?

Incandescent

These bulbs are definitely not energy efficient since most of their energy is expelled as heat and not light. Today most cities do not accept the recycling of incandescent light bulbs as they have stopped being sold in the United States. Nonetheless, because they do not contain any toxic materials they can simply be thrown away.  Some people choose to re-package their light bulbs to avoid anyone getting hurt in the process of disposing them. Other people choose to reuse their light bulbs if they are not broken as forms of decoration, ornaments, and DIY crafts.

CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamps)

CFLs have become way more popular over the past few years because of their fair prices and energy saving qualities. Unfortunately, a downside they have is that they contain a small amount of mercury, which means one should be particularly careful when recycling these light bulbs. Whether one can recycle or dispose these light bulbs depends on the current state of the bulbs. Nonetheless, it is imperative that CFLs be recycled. CFL light bulbs contain a small amount of mercury so when disposing these light bulbs it’ll be best to not release those chemicals to the environment. Most of the materials used to make CFL light bulbs can be recycled, and in some states and/or local jurisdictions, CFL light bulbs are required to be recycled. CFL light bulbs will not only be more energy efficient for your home, but will also save you money in the long run. Although CFL light bulbs are a bit more expensive than their incandescent counterpart, they last more than 10 times longer and use 4 times less energy while providing equally good quality light. Since CFL’s use much less watts than regular incandescent light bulbs, not only will they last longer but they will also save you money.

LED (Light Emitting Diodes)

LEDs are probably the pinnacle in light bulb technology. Their design and structure has resulted in a more durable, resistant and stylish light bulb. LED light bulbs are slowly being adopted now that their high prices are coming down. Unlike their more primitive counterparts, LEDs contain fewer hazardous materials, and are much more resistant to temperature, humidity and force. LED’s also last roughly 50,000 hours (5.5 years), about 5 times longer than CFLs.

Japan and Cambridge Target Renewable Energy

During the summer of 2014 several high school students interned at the Cambridge Energy Alliance helping with canvassing and outreach across Cambridge. The interns also wrote a few blogs on topics they were interested in related to energy efficiency and solar power. The following is one of their blogs.  

 

Renewable energy and energy efficiency may be a common topic in Cambridge, but there is still much we can learn from around the world.

In Japan, energy efficiency policies have been administered under the Energy Conservation Law since 1979, which forces manufacturers to increase the energy efficiency of their products. However, energy efficiency and renewable energy has become more essential in Japan today.

After the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, which took place in Fukushima Daiichi in March 2011, Japan reconsidered its energy sources for the rest of the century. At the time, Japan was still generating 30% of its electricity from nuclear power. To replace that energy, Japan had to look elsewhere. Since Japan doesn’t have its own significant fossil fuel reserves, Japan considered a switch to solar power. According to the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, Japan saw a significant increase in renewable energy generation capacity after July 2012, the nation’s renewable energy production capacity rose by 5.85 million kW. Solar power accounted for over 90 percent of the increase, at 5.6 million kW.

m1

Another impact of the 2011 earthquake was the growth of energy efficiency and conservation. This movement is called “Setsuden” and is encouraging people and companies to save electricity by taking simple steps like changing light bulbs, or turning off big screens and exterior lighting. Also, the dress code in offices has eased up in order to reduce demand for AC. Even these small improvements have proven to have a short-term impact. Greentech Media reports that “they’ve dramatically increased the awareness of energy use and energy efficiency, and large companies are running high-profile efficiency programs.” Now demand reduction makes up a sizeable portion of Japan’s power generation.

m2

The City of Cambridge is also taking steps to reduce energy use in its municipal buildings. The graph below demonstrates the fluctuations in energy usage and emissions from year to year, with an overall downward trend.

m3

Looking at Japan’s achievements, a key lesson can be applied to Massachusetts: solar energy and demand reduction through efficiency can dramatically change the power generation in a short period of time. Just as in Japan, there is both great solar and efficiency potential in the state of Massachusetts and City of Cambridge.

 

Sources:

https://www.cambridgema.gov/~/media/Files/publicworksdepartment/greenliving/Energy%20efficiency%20presentation.ashx

http://theenergycollective.com/guayjguay/366271/how-japan-replaced-half-its-nuclear-capacity-efficiency

http://fortune.com/2013/09/23/japans-green-energy-evolution/

http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot316.nsf/veritydisplay/5a74498fcc9fbabbc1257864005160e4/$file/japan.pdf

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/electricity_generation.cfm/state=MA

Solar Panels in Cold Climates

During the summer of 2014 several high school students interned at the Cambridge Energy Alliance helping with canvassing and outreach across Cambridge. The interns also wrote a few blogs on topics they were interested in related to energy efficiency and solar power. The following is one of their blogs.  

 

Think about this: as of now, Germany is the world leader in solar energy. It uses more solar power than any other country in the world. Now think about this: Germany is equal to Alaska in solar resources. If Germany is a good place for solar paneling, then Cambridge must be too! But can cold climate places really sustain solar paneling?

What most people don’t know is that solar panels run off of light, not heat. Many panels have the ability to track the sun’s movement and even rotate during the day. As a matter of fact, solar panels perform better in very cold weather than they do in very hot weather for two reasons: first, solar panels sometimes malfunction when they get too hot themselves; second, as temperatures go down, the system’s voltage increases. Furthermore, by combining this higher voltage with a current identical to a warm weather current, a higher wattage is produced. Therefore, more power is created.

Unfortunately, cold weather tends to come with clouds, rain, and snow. These forms of precipitation do have an effect on a solar panel system because they affect how much the panels are exposed to sunlight. However, it must be noted that estimates for the expected production of energy over the course of a solar system’s lifetime take into account the days with lower output due to weather obstacles such as snow and clouds.

On a cloudy day, not as much light can reach the panels. The amount of energy produced when there is cloud cover depends on the density of the clouds, but is usually about 10-25% of the system’s rated capacity. However, panels produce the most energy at the moment when the sun peeks across the edge of a cloud. When this happens, panels actually produce in excess of their rated capacity.

Usually clouds come with rain, and although there isn’t much daylight, rain can actually help solar paneling systems. Rain helps to keep up the maintenance of solar panels by washing away dust and dirt. Also, when the sun comes out, it reflects off of surrounding rainwater and onto the panels, increasing the amount of light being absorbed.

The biggest weather issue that solar panels seem to face is snow. When covered with snow, panels are no longer subject to sunlight, and they are not able to produce power. Nonetheless, it’s easy to resume their operation immediately by just brushing off the snow. By removing as much snow as possible, more of the dark-colored panel will be exposed to the sun, allowing a current to flow which will heat up all the panels and melt the remaining snow. It’s also common in snowy climates to install solar at a steep angle. This way, snow will slide off faster, allowing sunlight to reflect off of nearby snow and onto the panels. Imagine this working in the same way that a skier can be burned on a sunny winter day: Just like the sun reflects off of the snow and onto the skier’s skin, it will reflect off the snow and onto the panels, increasing power generation.

Capture

Now, how about our hometown? This past winter, Cambridge’s lowest temperatures averaged at about 1°F (-17°C) and the city saw approximately 40 days of snow. Therefore, for 89% of the year, roofs in Cambridge were exposed to sunlight and saw great potential for solar paneling. Just like Germany, the cold winters of Cambridge can give way to solar paneling for houses all around.

 

Bibliography:

“Ask a Builder: How Well Do Solar Panels Work in the Winter?” Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. N.p.,                             n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Extreme Winter Weather Affecting Some Solar Panels’ Energy Output, Maintenance, Officials                                       Said.” NJ.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Solar Panel Effectiveness & Production in the Winter.” Winter Solar Panel Effectiveness & Production.                  N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Frequently Asked Questions about Solar Panels.” Frequently Asked Questions about Solar Panels. N.p.,                  n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Winter, Snow, and Solar Panels: A Mixed Forecast – CNET.” CNET. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“2014 Winter Blasts Affecting Energy Output and Maintenance of Solar Panels — Environmental                                  Protection.” 2014 Winter Blasts Affecting Energy Output and Maintenance of Solar Panels —                              Environmental Protection. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014

“Are Solar Panels Usable in Snowy Climates?” AccuWeather. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Solar Energy in Rainy Weather | Sunbridge Solar.” Sunbridge Solar. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014                             “SEIA.” Solar FAQ. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 July 2014.

“Germany the World’s Leading Light in Solar Capacity.” Www.edmontonjournal.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 31               July 2014.

Solar Co-ops: Another Way to Go Solar

On Earth Day, the Rocky Mountain Insitute  reminded us of an effective tool for solar development: the solar co-operative. Like any co-operative, solar co-ops pool the resources of many in order to increase purchasing power, increase access to benefits, and create other efficiencies. Businesses and/or individual consumers band together to collectively purchase solar photovoltaic (PV) panels and share knowledge about best practices. Here are a few kinds of solar co-operatives that are relevant to Cambridge residents.

Community Solar

One type of co-operative concept called community solar can help bring solar to those who typically wouldn’t have access to it, such as renters or any households without enough rooftop sun exposure. Community solar allows customers to buy into an off-site system and receive credits on their utility bills. Customers can purchase as much or as little solar energy as they want, and they don’t have to worry about installation or maintenance.  The Clean Energy Collective  was one of the first organizations to establish this model and they now operate multiple solar gardens throughout the US.

Residential Solar Co-op

The Mt. Pleasant Solar Cooperative offers another model for co-operative solar, as the Washington, D.C. area neighborhood group has organized over 300 households in order to purchase solar PV panels in bulk. This has reduced installation costs for households getting PV panels and has ultimately brought more solar power into the community than would have otherwise been the case. In addition to increasing the affordability of solar, the co-op network fostered a supportive atmosphere that diminished other barriers to solar energy. Says Mt. Pleasant solar system owner Louise Meyer: “I felt like I was part of a team, it made much more sense, you could compare notes and not feel so stranded. It was such a new area for many people, and the paperwork is such a hassle, being part of the cooperative made it so much easier.”

The Mt. Pleasant model has spurred the creation of other neighborhood solar co-ops in the region as well. Several of the neighborhood groups are further organized under the umbrella organization DC SUN, which advocates for solar energy and serves as a regional resource for anyone interested in solar.

Conclusion

The solar co-op model is a promising tool to increase solar energy development in a range of contexts. With its variety of housing types and large multifamily housing stock, we see co-operative solar as a viable solution for Cambridge. What do you think? Would one of these models work for you?

About this Blog Post

This blog post summarizes information from a Rocky Mountain Institute blog post. You can read the original article here:  http://blog.rmi.org/blog_2014_04_22_the_rise_of_solar_coops

Energy Efficient Lighting Upgrades for City Buildings

The City has taken another exciting step toward reducing energy use by performing lighting upgrades at the Coffon Building, Engine 8 (Taylor Square), Fire Headquarters and three buildings at the Cambridge Cemetery. Existing lights within these facilities have been replaced with high-efficiency lamps and fixtures, and occupancy sensors have been installed in many locations throughout the buildings in order to reduce energy use and costs even further. Projected energy savings from these lighting efficiency upgrades is an estimated 130,000 kilowatt hours/year, resulting in avoided costs of approximately $18,000/year for the City. These energy savings represent averting close to 200,000 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere annually, the equivalent of removing 18 cars from the road!

The electric use of these buildings will continue to be monitored as part of the City’s Green Community commitment to reduce energy use by 20% from its FY08 baseline. Energy efficient lighting technologies have been installed in 22 municipal buildings over the past two years with a projected total savings of 1.3 megawatt hours/year.

Stay tuned for future energy efficiency upgrades!

2011 Intern Dana Rubin to Travel the U.S. in Search of Practical Environmentalism

2011 summer intern Dana Rubin will be traveling around the country starting on September 1st, 2012 to seek out the practical and economical environmental projects that are occurring all across the nation.

Dana, and her partner-in-crime Hannah Blackmer, want to take the fear out of climate change and make it a more positive transition. There are so many projects that individuals and small businesses can conveniently do to build up a better resilience to save money and help the environment.  Their voyage is The Search for Convenient Resilience and they will be seeking out projects that range from homesteading, rooftop gardens, personal alternative energies and upcycling projects.

Dana and Hannah, recent graduates of Mount Holyoke College, really need your help to raise enough funding to make the endeavor possible. The duo is looking to raise about $15,000.

Have some cool projects they should check out? Want to follow their blog? Care to donate to their cause? Check out their website at: www.convenientresilience.com, like them on Facebook, or send them an e-mail at littlegreenthings.dh at gmail.com.

Search for the Solar Grail

This is a guest post from Eric Grunebaum from the great blog, EnergySage.

—————————————————————

Part 1

Search for the Solar Grail

Hello to new EnergySagers –

I’m located in Massachusetts and I thought my recent experiences looking into solar PV for my house might be helpful for folks.

First off, I should say that I’m pretty lucky to have an unobstructed south-facing roof. I’ve been thinking about solar for a while, and watching prices go down, so a couple of months ago I started asking people who had installed solar PV panels if they could recommend companies. I found two through word of mouth and then I found three more via EnergySage.com.

I was definitely interested in the “social” benefits of cutting back on fossil-fuel generated electricity, but what really surprised me is just how financially beneficial the project might be. It turns out that all of those other benefits of cutting back on fossil and nuclear generated power—reducing the massive health, economic, balance of trade and national security costs (not to mention the environmental risks of climate disturbance)—are just icing on the cake.

So back to the question of finding a solar company and figuring out if it makes financial sense. It turns out that Massachusetts is an especially good place for solar right now. It starts with saving (or eliminating) electric utility bills and then there’s the 30% federal tax credit, and also MA tax credits when you build a system.

And perhaps best of all, for the foreseeable future, there are solar renewable energy credits (“SREC”s) which you can sell every year based on how much electricity you produce. To get one SREC takes 1,000 kWh of solar energy production and the value of the credits range from $285 to $523 depending on the market. So when I calculated the yearly financial benefits, I looked at a low and a high side. There is some debate about how long the state will offer SRECs but as best I can tell, the SRECs are guaranteed to continue for 10 years at a minimum value of $285 for each 1,000 kWh you produce.

As I wrote, I received several bids and I’ve included the two best options below. One important thing to keep in mind is that are a few options for paying for your system. You can buy the system outright, finance it, or lease it. Leasing has different flavors too, some of which require no money upfront. But if you pay nothing upfront you get a smaller financial return which for some people that might be the way to go. You still save some money and you (or we!) still get all of the social benefits noted above.

For me, I don’t mind paying something upfront for a bigger return in the years to come, so the lease I looked at is what they call the “pre-paid” lease where you pay it all upfront and have no monthly payments. I compared that approach with the outright purchase.

There are many other options, but I’m just including what I think are the best two approaches, and also the best two bids, so this doesn’t get too complicated:

Vendor 1 System Size: 2.15 kW
Option A:Purchase$7690Cost of installation per kW: $3.58
Option B:Pre-Pay lease$6680Cost of installation per kW: $3.11

This comes with a 20-year warranty and is supposed to produce about 2,600 kWh – which is about 67% of my usage so my electricity bill will not go down to zero.

Either with the Pre-Pay lease or the Purchase, the savings are the same — see below. The question is why do the purchase? As far as I can tell there’s no good reason. It costs more and provides no additional benefits. Under the lease, though, if anything stops working, the company will fix it.

Electricity Savings @ .19/kWh = $489
Annual SRECs: 2.6Low$741High$1359
Total annual return:$1230$1848
Vendor 2 System Size: 3.2 kW
Option A:Purchase$11,170Cost of installation per kW: $3.49
Option B:Pre-Pay lease$8,030Cost of installation per kW: $2.51

This also comes with good warranties: 15 years for the labor with a 20-year guaranty on the production under a lease and also a guaranty that the panels will be at least 80% efficient up until 25 years. This system is supposed to produce about: 4,000-4,400kWh, which is 100% of my usage so my electricity bill should go down to nearly zero.

Again, with either the Pre-Pay lease or the Purchase, the savings are the same — so why buy? Note that this system produces more electricity, which means it produces more SRECs and therefore more income.

Electricity Savings @ .19/kWh = $741
Annual SRECs: 4Low$1140High$2092
Total annual return:$1881$2833

The long and short of it is that you don’t have to think about this the same way you would a kitchen or bath renovation which have no financial returns. Right now, at least in MA—and maybe some other states—it’s more like a mutual fund. If I invest $7,000 or $8,000, I’ll get from $1200 to $2800 back annually. That’s an annual return of something like 18-35% if I do one of the pre-paid leases. That’s not bad for helping out the planet a little bit and honestly I don’t think you can find a mutual fund that’s nearly as good.

 

Part 2

 

10:30 AM – the doorbell rings on Martin Luther King day. It’s 12 degrees out and the guy at the door – in blue coveralls with the NStar logo – is from the electric utility company. Carmine – that’s his name – is here to install two “net-meters” to prep for our upcoming PhotoVoltaic installation. He explains that normal electric meters go only one direction, but net-meters go forwards and backwards as well.

In the last few weeks we’ve signed all of the paperwork and so we’re on our way to an early February installation date with our PV vendor who beat out four other bidders. If you saw my prior post, we went with “Vendor 2” which – drum-roll please – is Independent Power systems. Based in Boulder, Colorado with branches in Massachusetts and Montana, they offered the best price per kW of capacity and are using SunPower panels, some of the most efficient on the market. This means we can install more panels and produce more electricity. And that means we’ll make more money selling the SRECs and save more on our electricity bills. IPS was also the only company that took the time look inside the attic crawlspace at the roof structure and then clambered up on the roof to get exact measurements. IPS went the extra mile and consulting with EnergySage.com confirmed my review of all the numbers.

And about all that paperwork – there was a fair amount of it with all of the incentives and credits and companies involved. It’s something the industry should definitely try to streamline, but all told, it probably took no more than a few hours of work, even factoring in that I actually read every one of the 26 pages in the pre-paid lease contract.

So today the utility is getting its ducks lined up too. All of those documents and notifications have led NStar to my door. What I still find amazing, though, is that the electric utility which makes money by selling electricity is actually helping me to buy less electricity. I’d be remiss if I didn’t applaud the enlightened utility regulation which rewards them for saving electricity and not just for building new power plants. Sometimes this is referred to as selling “negawatts.” To paraphrase Ben Franklin, a power plant saved is a power plant earned.

And here’s how it works with our utility: those net-meters meters will give us credit for all of the electricity we generate on our roof. And when we’re making more than we’re using, the meter will run backwards, effectively storing up credit for us to use at night or on a rainy day. If our system is in balance, as our installer predicts, each year we should produce almost exactly what we use, and our bill will be a very amount of under $10 month for use of the transmission lines. At the end of the year, if we generate more than we use, although we can’t sell it, we can give the “extra” electricity credit to a relative or friend.

The thought that we will soon break a small link in the energy monopoly and help build a new distributed generation economy is appealing. There are many people today who say we cannot possibly run the world without fossil fuels. Yet the evidence tells us otherwise. There are more jobs in renewables and efficiency, and most of them cannot be “off-shored.” And when the cost of renewables is nearly on par with fossil fuels then we can see that the world is changing. We are truly at an inflection point and as Richard Branson’s Independent Power systemsCarbon War Room puts it, “Over 50% of the climate change challenge can be addressed today – and profitably – by existing technologies, under existing policy. This is an opportunity marked as a crisis – arguably the largest wealth creation opportunity of our lifetime.”

And if we actually priced coal and oil properly, with all of the hidden costs to society factored in, then the benefits of cutting fossil fuel use would be even more starkly defined.

Maybe because it was Martin Luther King Day I was reminded of a quote from another civil rights pioneer, Bobby Kennedy. Kennedy spoke about sending forth a “tiny ripple of hope” which would cross with “a million different centers of energy” to grow in strength and change the world. Our solar panels may only be a single installation, but they have the potential to inspire many more, and gradually we will wean ourselves from a dependence on fuels which harm our health and the planet.

Best of all, we can do this not only because we will leave our children a better planet, but also because it can save us some serious money while we’re here.

Eric Grunebaum
Cambridge, MA